<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: G20 Voice &#8211; Logo design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dot-design.co.uk/g20-voice-logo-design/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dot-design.co.uk/g20-voice-logo-design</link>
	<description>Logo Design / Graphic Designer / Brochure Designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 10:10:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CL</title>
		<link>http://www.dot-design.co.uk/g20-voice-logo-design/comment-page-1#comment-43574</link>
		<dc:creator>CL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dot-design.co.uk/?p=986#comment-43574</guid>
		<description>Indeed, the speech bubble is &quot;the&quot; graphic meme for communicating openness, communicative, responsive and participatory. But wondering about the coherence of this design argument. Wondering if 50 bloggers is really enough to give &quot;the world&quot; a look inside the mysterious chambers of G20 leaders? 

As we all know, civil society and the general public are &quot;not allowed&quot; into the summits. What goes on inside the summit, and how it&#039;s presented and perceived outside, are managed by carefully crafted press releases. Journalists who attend press conferences are hand-picked. And now, there seem to be 50 bloggers making this inside-outside connection. I&#039;d be curious to know how they were chosen, who chose them and why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, the speech bubble is &#8220;the&#8221; graphic meme for communicating openness, communicative, responsive and participatory. But wondering about the coherence of this design argument. Wondering if 50 bloggers is really enough to give &#8220;the world&#8221; a look inside the mysterious chambers of G20 leaders? </p>
<p>As we all know, civil society and the general public are &#8220;not allowed&#8221; into the summits. What goes on inside the summit, and how it&#8217;s presented and perceived outside, are managed by carefully crafted press releases. Journalists who attend press conferences are hand-picked. And now, there seem to be 50 bloggers making this inside-outside connection. I&#8217;d be curious to know how they were chosen, who chose them and why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Coxon</title>
		<link>http://www.dot-design.co.uk/g20-voice-logo-design/comment-page-1#comment-16784</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Coxon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dot-design.co.uk/?p=986#comment-16784</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments, glad you like the work!

Gareth Coxons last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dot-design.co.uk/designers-creatives-grow-better-in-the-south-west/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Designers / Creatives grow better in the South West&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments, glad you like the work!</p>
<p>Gareth Coxons last blog post..<a href="http://www.dot-design.co.uk/designers-creatives-grow-better-in-the-south-west/" rel="nofollow">Designers / Creatives grow better in the South West</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billiard Lighting</title>
		<link>http://www.dot-design.co.uk/g20-voice-logo-design/comment-page-1#comment-16779</link>
		<dc:creator>Billiard Lighting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 19:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dot-design.co.uk/?p=986#comment-16779</guid>
		<description>i think that is a pretty sharp logo, simple yet expressive.  good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think that is a pretty sharp logo, simple yet expressive.  good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

